DAVIS v. CROFT


237 A.D.2d 163 (1997)

654 N.Y.S.2d 374

Charlene Davis et al., Respondents, and Jennifer Richards, Proposed Intervenor-Respondent, v. Kathryn Croft et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 18, 1997


Generally, class certification is inappropriate where governmental operations are concerned, since any relief granted to an individual petitioner challenging a governmental operation will adequately flow to others similarly situated under principles of stare decisis (Matter of Martin v Lavine, 39 N.Y.2d 72, 75). We find no reason to depart from this general rule in this matter, as petitioners...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases