FENNELL & MINKOFF v. WALL ST. TRANSCRIPT CORP.


239 A.D.2d 160 (1997)

657 N.Y.S.2d 46

Fennell & Minkoff, Respondent, v. Wall Street Transcript Corporation, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 6, 1997


The trial court properly rejected defendant's claim that the verdict was inconsistent, since the jury, pursuant to the court's instructions, was entitled to find that plaintiff's account stated and quantum meruit claims applied to different periods of its representation of defendant, that the account stated had been satisfied by defendant's last payment, and that compensation was due only for the period that plaintiff was entitled to recover in quantum meruit. Since the amount...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases