1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 78 Ohio
  5. 78 Ohio St.3d 315 (1997)
 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. YURICH

No. 96-2433.

78 Ohio St.3d 315 (1997)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. YURICH.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 30, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geoffrey Stern, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harald F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Mark H. Aultman, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. An attorney's disclosure of client confidences has heretofore warranted a public reprimand. Geauga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Psenicka (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 35, 577 N.E.2d 1074. Although in this case respondent's disclosure was inadvertent, respondent's negligence enabled a son to discover that he was to be disinherited by his parents, one of whom was still...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases