YAO v. BULT


245 A.D.2d 136 (1997)

666 N.Y.S.2d 159

Richard Yao, Appellant, v. John Bult, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 16, 1997


The complaint was properly dismissed as alleging an extortionate contract (see, Stone v Freeman, 298 N.Y. 268; People v Dioguardi, 8 N.Y.2d 260). We would add that the alleged contract is also unenforceable because incapable of complete performance before the end of a lifetime (General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [1]). The sanction was properly imposed upon a finding that the action was "undertaken primarily *...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases