HOTEL STATLER v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 96-1738.

79 Ohio St.3d 299 (1997)

HOTEL STATLER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 30, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A., Fred Siegel and Annrita S. Johnson, for appellants.

Armstrong, Mitchell & Damiani, Timothy J. Armstrong and Deborah J. Papushak, for appellee Cleveland Board of Education.


Per Curiam.

Appellants' first claim is that the BTA erred in rejecting the adjustments Kocinski made to the value he determined using the income capitalization approach. For reasons which will be discussed later, we will be considering only tax year 1991.

Ohio Adm.Code 5705-3-03(D)(2) describes the income approach to value as follows: "The value is estimated by capitalizing the net income after expenses, including normal vacancies and credit losses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases