INGRAHAM v. TROWBRIDGE BUILDERS


297 N.J. Super. 72 (1997)

JAMES L. INGRAHAM, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TROWBRIDGE BUILDERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, INTERVENOR-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 30, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas P. Thackston argued the cause for appellant (Davis, Reberkenny & Abramowitz, attorneys).

Respondent James L. Ingraham argued the cause pro se.

Cheryl R. Clarke, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the Intervenor (Peter Verniero, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mary C. Jacobson, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).

Before Judges KEEFE, CONLEY and LOFTUS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D.

Defendant Trowbridge Builders (Trowbridge) appeals from a judgment entered against it and in favor of plaintiff James L. Ingraham (Ingraham) in the amount of $4,300 after a non-jury trial. On appeal, Trowbridge contends that the trial judge erred in failing to apply N.J.A.C. 5:25-1.3, a regulation promulgated by the Department of Community Affairs (Department) pursuant to the New Home Warranty and Builders...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases