1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 306 N.J.
  5. 306 N.J. Super. 61 (1997)
 

WOODRICK v. JACK J. BURKE REAL ESTATE, INC.

306 N.J. Super. 61 (1997)

BRADFORD WOODRICK AND DONNA WOODRICK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JACK J. BURKE REAL ESTATE, INC. DBA FOX & LAZO REALTORS, MAXINE BRIMMER AND CHARLES FRANK, DEFENDANTS, AND FOX & LAZO, INC., REALTORS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 9, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sean T. O'Meara argued the cause for appellant (Archer & Greiner, attorneys for appellant; Mr. O'Meara, of counsel and on the brief).

David F. Swerdlow argued the cause for respondents (Jamieson, Moore, Peskin & Spicer, attorneys; Michael F. Spicer, of counsel; Mr. Swerdlow, on the brief).

Before Judges LONG, KLEINER and KIMMELMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LONG, P.J.A.D.

On October 18, 1990, plaintiffs, Bradford and Donna Woodrick, filed a complaint in which they alleged that Jack Burke Real Estate, Inc., (Burke) acting as an agent of Fox & Lazo Realtors, made certain misrepresentations to them in connection with the sale of their residence on Cleveland Avenue in Trenton which caused the breach of that contract and which delayed the closing of the Woodricks' purchase of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases