Defendant's claims that the court erroneously instructed the jury to consider whether defendant acted as an accomplice with an unapprehended participant in the crime or improperly amended the indictment regarding the theory of accessorial liability are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review them, we would find
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.