The court properly permitted a police witness to testify that defendant changed direction upon making "eye-to-eye contact" with the witness. Rather than expressing an opinion or describing defendant's mental operations, the use of that phrase was necessary for the purpose of accurately describing the officer's actual observations (see, People v Hackett,
Even assuming...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.