CESARE v. CESARE


302 N.J. Super. 57 (1997)

KATHLEEN CESARE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD CESARE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 19, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald W. Stieh argued the cause for appellant (Stanton & Stieh, attorneys; Mr. Stieh, of counsel, and on the brief).

Paul D. Amitrani argued the cause for respondent (Bowers, Murphy, Lieberman, Amitrani & Lambo, attorneys; Mr. Amitrani, on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, LANDAU and WALLACE.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant Richard Cesare appeals from the entry of a domestic violence order. He argues that the Family Part Judge erred as a matter of law in finding that he committed an act of domestic violence.

Kathleen Cesare, the plaintiff, and Richard Cesare, the defendant, had been married for thirteen years and had three children, ages 12, 10, and 6 at the time of the hearing. The plaintiff, a school teacher...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases