OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. NICHOLSON

No. 93-391.

80 Ohio St.3d 275 (1997)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. NICHOLSON.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 19, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, Lori J. Brown and Cynthia L. Roehl, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Thomas G. Nicholson, pro se.


Per Curiam.

Paragraph EC 7-36 of our Ethical Considerations provides that "[j]udicial hearings ought to be conducted through dignified and orderly procedures designed to protect the rights of all parties. Although a lawyer has the duty to represent his client zealously, he should not engage in any conduct that offends the dignity and decorum of the proceedings." EC 7-37 provides, "In adversary proceedings, clients are litigants and though ill feeling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases