Appellants' cross claim against respondents was properly dismissed upon plaintiff's sworn statement that he was injured on appellants' property, not, as he originally alleged, on respondents' property; appellants' failure to come forward with evidence to the contrary; and plaintiff's discontinuance with prejudice as against respondents. Since the accident could not have occurred at both locations, there is no possibility that both appellants and respondents contributed to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
