ROY v. GOMEZ

No. 94-15994.

108 F.3d 242 (1997)

Kenneth Duane ROY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ; John Van de Kamp; and William Merkle, et al., Respondents-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 4, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hill C. Snellings, Blackmon & Drozd, Sacramento, California, for petitioner-appellant.

Margaret Venturi, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for respondents-appellees.

Before HUG, C.J., and BROWNING, WALLACE, FLETCHER, PREGERSON, POOLE, REINHARDT, HALL, THOMPSON, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

In California v. Roy, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 337, 136 L.Ed.2d 266 (1996), the United States Supreme Court reversed this court's en banc decision, Roy v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 863 (1996), and held that "the State, and the dissenting judges in the Ninth Circuit, are correct about the proper standard" of collateral review. Roy, ___ U.S. at ___, 117 S.Ct. at 338. The Court was "convinced that the `harmless error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases