KITA v. BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD


305 N.J. Super. 43 (1997)

LUCIEN KITA AND FRANCES KITA, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS/CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. THE BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 14, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Messick argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent.

David C. Patterson argued the cause for respondents/cross-appellants.

Before Judges BAIME, WEFING and BRAITHWAITE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

A jury awarded plaintiffs $112,000 in damages for the diminution in the value of their land allegedly caused by the overflow of water resulting from defendant's negligent maintenance of drainage pipes and ditches. Defendant appeals, contending that the trial court erred by denying its motions for an involuntary dismissal and for a new trial. Defendant also argues that the damage award was excessive. Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases