The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The credibility issues raised by defendant were properly placed before the jury, and we find no reason to disturb its determination.
Since defendant acquiesced in the court's ruling, his present contention that the court erred in precluding testimony regarding a prank he had allegedly played on a friend is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to review it...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.