1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 122 F.3d
  5. 122 F.3d 215 (1997)
 

U.S. v. PALMER

Nos. 95-21027, 96-20109.

122 F.3d 215 (1997)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stacy Anne PALMER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stacy Anne PALMER, Samuel Lloyd Deblasio, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

September 3, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary Jane Harmon, Paula Camille Offenhauser, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael E. Tigar, Rachel A. Bellis, haddon, Morgan & Foreman, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellant Stacy Anne Palmer.

Samuel Lloyd DeBlasio, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant-Appellant Samuel Lloyd DeBlasio.

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

Defendants were convicted of mail and wire fraud for engaging in a nationwide tele-marketing scheme. Stacy Anne Palmer argues that her conviction was barred by double jeopardy, that her trial should have been severed from that of DeBlasio, and that the district court erred in applying the Sentencing Guidelines. Samuel Lloyd DeBlasio argues his counsel was ineffective and that his sentence was miscalculated. We are compelled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases