STATE EX REL. ARNETT v. WINEMILLER

No. 97-1359.

80 Ohio St.3d 255 (1997)

[THE STATE EX REL.] ARNETT ET AL., APPELLEES, v. WINEMILLER, CLERK OF COUNCIL, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 1, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles J. Arnett, pro se.

Gottschlich & Portune, LLP, and Robert E. Portune, for appellees Randolph Township and Randolph Township Board of Trustees.

Coolidge, Wall, Womsley & Lombard Co., L.P.A., and Janice M. Paulus, for appellees Julie A. Johnson, Jerry Vaughn, Carmen Y. Lash, Randolph Township, and Randolph Township Board of Trustees.

Joseph Moore & Associates, Joseph P. Moore and Paul M. Courtney, for appellant.


Per Curiam.

Winemiller asserts in her propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in granting the writ of mandamus. In order to be entitled to the writ, appellees had to establish that (1) they have a clear legal right to have Winemiller transmit the initiative petition and a certified copy of the text of the proposed ordinance and certify the sufficiency and validity of the petition to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases