CALIF. FOR POP. STABILIZATION v. HEWLETT-PACKARD CO.

Docket Nos. H013638, H014028, H014384.

58 Cal.App.4th 273 (1997)

CALIFORNIANS FOR POPULATION STABILIZATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. CALIFORNIANS FOR POPULATION STABILIZATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TATA SONS LIMITED et al., Defendants and Respondents. CALIFORNIANS FOR POPULATION STABILIZATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TATA SONS LIMITED et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

September 25, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Mary T. Dumont, Michael J. Lowy, James Danaher, Jr., Kathleen S. Rogers, Severson & Werson and William L. Stern for Plaintiff and Appellant and for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Kelley, Drye & Warren, Paul L. Bressan, Cynthia S. Papsdorf, Fenwick & West, Patricia M. Lucas, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Dennis A. Gladwell and Susan B. Burr for Defendants and Appellants and for Defendants and Respondents Tata Sons Limited et al.


OPINION

MIHARA, J.

Plaintiff Californians for Population Stabilization (CAPS) appeals from judgments in favor of defendants Tata Sons Limited and its division Tata Consultancy Services (collectively Tata) and Hewlett-Packard Company (H-P). Tata appeals from an order denying its motion for attorney's fees.1 For the reasons stated below, we affirm both judgments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases