Defendant's documentary evidence established that plaintiff discovered its employee's dishonesty, and therefore its "loss", in March 1992; that plaintiff thereafter submitted a proof of loss for a single transaction that defendant accepted as timely, investigated and settled; and that two years later, plaintiff submitted additional proofs of loss for two other transactions involving the same employee. The IAS Court correctly held that these later claims were untimely under...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
