BOROUGH OF NORTH HALEDON v. BOARD OF EDUC.


305 N.J. Super. 19 (1997)

BOROUGH OF NORTH HALEDON, PASSAIC COUNTY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE MANCHESTER REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, PASSAIC COUNTY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, AND BOROUGH OF HALEDON, PASSAIC COUNTY, BOROUGH OF PROSPECT PARK, PASSAIC COUNTY, AND STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 8, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James V. Segreto argued the cause for appellant Borough of North Haledon (Segreto & Segreto, attorneys; James V. Segreto, of counsel and on the brief).

Stephen R. Fogarty argued the cause for respondent Board of Education of the Manchester Regional High School District (Fogarty & Hara, attorneys; Mr. Fogarty, of counsel, Kevin M. McEwen, on the brief).

George O. Foster, Municipal Attorney, attorney for respondent Borough of Haledon, submitted a letter relying on the brief and appendix submitted by respondent Board of Education of the Manchester Regional High School District.

Hook, Smith & Meyer, attorneys for respondent Borough of Prospect Park, submitted a letter relying on the brief and appendix submitted by respondent Board of Education of the Manchester Regional High School District (Gordon D. Meyer, on the letter).

Peter Verniero, Attorney General, attorney for respondent State Board of Education (Mary F. Rubinstein, Deputy Attorney General, on the statement in lieu of brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, SKILLMAN and WERTHEIMER.


The decision of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

The Board of Education of the Passaic County Manchester Regional High School District (Regional Board) concluded that a proposal to change the method of apportioning costs was defeated in the April 18, 1995 election because two of the three constituent municipalities comprising the regional school district failed to adopt it. The Borough of North Haledon's petition to challenge

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases