LAVIN v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BD.

Docket No. B108188.

57 Cal.App.4th 263 (1997)

LEONARD LAVIN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BOARD, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

August 22, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Floyd D. Shimomura, Assistant Attorney General, Cyrus J. Rickards, and Daniel G. Stone, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant.

Wallace & Schwartz, Steve R. Schwartz and George M. Wallace as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Richard W. Craigo, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Robert Forgnone for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

DUNN, J.*

The California Horse Racing Board appeals from the judgment of the superior court of October 23, 1996, ordering that a peremptory writ of mandamus pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 issue commanding appellant to vacate its decision of December 15, 1995, by which it determined that three horses were disqualified and their purses forfeited.

A. FACTS

Lady...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases