Respondent's claim that his incarceration prevented him from communicating with the children and the agency for the statutory six-month period (Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [b]; [5] [a]) is contradicted by his admissions that he knew the agency's name, was able to make telephone calls while in jail, and had in fact called other members of his family (see, Matter of Anthony M.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.