Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings of fact of the board and find that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), 6-101(A)(3), and 7-102(A)(5) in his representation of John Stewart Murray. Further we conclude that respondent engaged in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law in violation of DR 1-102(A)(6) by reason of his conviction for attempted drug abuse, by his undertaking to represent Murray when he had failed to comply with the registration...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.