1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 304 N.J.
  5. 304 N.J. Super. 1 (1997)
 

STATE v. FRIEDMAN

304 N.J. Super. 1 (1997)

STATE OF NEW JERSEY (TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON), PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MARVIN J. FRIEDMAN AND MARSHA FRIEDMAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 7, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen H. Roth argued the cause for appellants.

Kenneth G. Poller argued the cause for respondent Township of Washington.

Before Judges PETRELLA and WALLACE.

PER CURIAM

Defendants Marvin J. Friedman and his wife Marsha Friedman appeal from their convictions after a trial de novo in the Law Division of violations of Washington Township's anti-noise ordinance on eight separate occasions when their dog's barking awakened their neighbor between the hours of 6:12 and 6:44 a.m. The Law Division Judge imposed the same $40 fine for each violation, totaling $320, as had the Municipal Court.

On appeal, the Friedmans...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases