IN RE PET. FOR AUTH. TO CONDUCT


298 N.J. Super. 1 (1997)

IN RE PETITION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CONDUCT A REFERENDUM ON THE DISSOLUTION OF UNION COUNTY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 20, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Agnes I. Rymer argued the cause for appellants Board of Education of the Borough of Garwood and Borough of Garwood (DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick & Gluck, attorneys; Ms. Rymer and J.S. Lee Cohen, on the brief).

Robert A. Goodsell argued the cause for respondent Borough of Mountainside (Post, Polak, Goodsell & Macneill, attorneys; John N. Post and Mr. Goodsell, on the brief).

Nancy Kaplan, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent N.J. Department of Education, Board of Review (Peter Verniero, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mary C. Jacobson, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Michelle Lyn Miller, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Vito A. Gagliardi, Jr. argued the cause for respondents Boards of Education of Berkeley Heights, Kenilworth, Mountainside and Springfield (Ravin, Sarasohn, Cook, Baumgarten, Fisch & Rosen, attorneys; Mr. Gagliardi, of counsel and on the brief; Michael R. Cole of Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, of counsel).

Douglas J. Kovats argued the cause for respondent Board of Education of Clark (Kenney & Gross, attorneys; Mr. Kovats, on the brief).

No other parties participated in this appeal.

Before Judges BROCHIN, KESTIN and EICHEN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BROCHIN, J.A.D.

Since 1935, the Union County Regional High School District No. 1 has been responsible for providing a high school education for students residing in the six municipalities of Berkeley Heights, Clark, Garwood, Kenilworth, Mountainside and Springfield. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:13-51, the boards of education and governing bodies of five of these municipalities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases