CAMERON v. CAMERON

No. 95-0311.

209 Wis.2d 88 (1997)

562 N.W.2d 126

James H. CAMERON, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Jane P. CAMERON, n/k/a Jane Wise, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided April 22, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there was a brief by Timothy M. Doyle and Thrasher, Doyle, Pelish & Franti, Ltd., Rice Lake and oral argument by Timothy M. Doyle.

For the petitioner-respondent there was a brief by Donald L. Hoeft, Steven E. Antolak and London, Anderson, Antolak & Hoeft, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN and oral argument by Steven E. Antolak.


¶ 1. JANINE P. GESKE, J.

Jane Wise (Wise) asks us to reverse the decision of the court of appeals affirming an order of the circuit court imposing a trust on child support arrearages owed by her former husband, James Cameron (Cameron).1 Pursuant to that order, Cameron and Wise jointly own the trust, but disbursements are controlled by the circuit court. The question presented is whether the circuit court erred by imposing a trust...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases