RAYMER v. ENRIGHT

No. 96-1183.

113 F.3d 172 (1997)

Scott Elliott RAYMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Ray ENRIGHT and Robert Pastore, of the Colorado State Board of Parole, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

May 6, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Richman of Burns, Figa & Will, Englewood, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Paul S. Sanzo, First Assistant Attorney General, Civil Litigation Section (Gale A. Norton, Attorney General, with him on the briefs), Denver, Colorado, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before BRORBY, LOGAN and HENRY, Circuit Judges.


LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Scott Elliott Raymer appeals from the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The issue before us is whether 1994 amendments to the Colorado parole statutes that decreased the frequency of parole suitability hearings for certain classes of prisoners violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. As applied to plaintiff, we hold they do not, and hence we affirm the dismissal.

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases