The court properly denied defendant's requests to introduce or otherwise refer to a videotaped statement that he had made to an Assistant District Attorney but which the People did not introduce, although they introduced his earlier statements to the police. Since the videotaped statement came many hours after his statements to the police, there was a "definite, pronounced break" in defendant's interrogation (People v Chapple,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ARRIOLA
245 A.D.2d 34 (1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 782
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Fernando Arriola, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 4, 1997
December 4, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.