1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 113 F.3d
  5. 113 F.3d 163 (1997)
 

CARROLL v. FEDERAL EXP. CORP.

No. 95-16603.

113 F.3d 163 (1997)

Richard CARROLL III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided May 6, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Ray Bacon, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellant.

J. Russell Stedman and Thomas R. Beer, Barger & Wolen, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee.

Before RONEY, BEEZER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Federal Express Corporation ("Federal Express") fired Richard Carroll III ("Carroll") from his job as a courier after he tested positive for using cocaine following a random drug test required by Department of Transportation ("DOT") regulations, 49 C.F.R. §§ 391.109, 391.111 ("DOT regulations"). Carroll sued Federal Express alleging constitutional and state law claims arising out of his termination. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases