TWP. OF WEST WINDSOR v. NIERENBERG


150 N.J. 111 (1997)

695 A.2d 1344

TOWNSHIP OF WEST WINDSOR IN THE COUNTY OF MERCER, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. YVETTE NIERENBERG AND PRINCETON MANOR ASSOCIATES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 30, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward D. McKirdy argued the cause for appellant Yvette Nierenberg (McKirdy and Riskin, attorneys).

Andrew J. Rothman argued the cause for appellant Princeton Manor Associates (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin & Davis, attorneys).

Richard L. Rudin argued the cause for respondent (Weiner Lesniak, attorneys).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

This case concerns the appropriate date for valuing condemned property pursuant to the Eminent Domain Act of 1971 (N.J.S.A. 20:3-1 to -50) (Act). The Act provides for three possible valuation dates: the date the condemnor takes possession of the property being condemned either in whole or in part, N.J.S.A. 20:3-30(a); the date on which the condemnation action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases