ERICSSON GE MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC.; Murata Manufacturing Company, Ltd., et al.; Matsushita Electric Corporation of America, et al.; OKI Electric Industry Company, Ltd.; Mitsubishi Electric Corp., et al.; Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant,
Motorola, Incorporated, Defendant-Intervenor.
MURATA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD. and Murata Electronics North America, Inc., Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant.
United States Court of International Trade.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 22, 1997.
January 22, 1997.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, P.C. (Gail T. Cumins, Ned H. Marshak), New York City, for plaintiff Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc.
Weil, Gotshal & Manges (Jeffrey L. Kessler, Katherine A. Surprenant), New York City, for plaintiffs Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Communication Industrial Corporation of America.
Baker & McKenzie (B. Thomas Peele, III), Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs Mitsubishi Electric Corp. and Mitsubishi Consumer Electronics America, Inc.
Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering (Ronald I. Meltzer, Robert C. Cassidy, Jr.), Washington, D.C., for plaintiff OKI Electric Industry Co., Ltd.
Arnold & Porter (Richard A. Johnson, Michael T. Shor, Susan T. Morita), Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Murata Electronics North America.
Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General of the United States; David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice (A. David Lafer), Mark A. Barnett, Office of Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of counsel, Washington, D.C., for defendant.
Covington & Burling (Harvey M. Applebaum, David R. Grace) & Motorola, Inc. (Timothy A. Harr), Washington, D.C., for defendant-intervenor Motorola, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade.
OPINION
CARMAN, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs, Murata Manufacturing Company, Ltd. and Murata Electronics North America, Incorporated1 (collectively "Murata") and others (collectively "plaintiffs") challenge the Department of Commerce's ("Department" or "Commerce") remand decision in Final Scope Remand — Antidumping Duty Order on Cellular Mobile Telephones and Subassemblies from...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
