THE MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Joe ADAMS, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 19, 1997.
August 19, 1997.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
James W. Gewin, Michael R. Pennington, Charles K. Hamilton, Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiffs.
Clay Hornsby, Morris, Haynes, Ingram & Hornsby, Alexander, AL, for Defendants Jean Anderson, Vivian Thomas, William Thomas, Jeanne Wilson, William Wilson, Michael H. Shepherd, Dawn Shepherd and Betty Cole Shepherd.
Samuel A. Cherry, Jr., Cherry, Givens, Peters & Lockett, Dothan, AL, for Defendants Danny Blackmon, Karen Blackmon, Christi Green, Patricia Anne Wilson, Lyle Wilson and Stephen J. Marshall.
George Beck, Montgomery, AL, for Defendants Ernest and Mildred Blair, Richard Williams and Erma Williams.
Adam P. Morel, Pittman, Hooks, Marsh, Dutton & Hollis, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant Michael Byrd, Mavis Williams, James R. Williams, Sr. and James R. Williams, Jr.
Thomas P. Melton, IV, Taylor & Taylor, Birmingham, AL, for Defendants Jimmy Easterling, Sandra Easterling, James W. Johnson, Philip Mangum, Jr. and Wayne Industries, Inc.
Steven F. Schmitt, Schmitt & Harper PC, Tallassee, AL, for Defendant J. Paul Kennedy.
Joseph M. Cloud, Morris Cloud & Conchin, Huntsville, AL, for Ralph Montgomery.
Charles A. McCallum, III, Campbell & Waller LLC, Birmingham, AL, for Defendants Max Stern and Jeffrey M. Stern.
Phillip W. McCallum, Jennifer L. Haines, McCallum & Associates PC, Birmingham, AL, R.G. Methvin, Jr., Robert G. Methvin Jr., PC, Birmingham, AL, for Defendants Danny L. Austin, John W. Clark and Elijah Massey.
Stephen D. Heninger, Heninger Burge & Vargo, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant Henry Finley.
United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division.
FINAL ORDER
GUIN, District Judge.
This cause came to be heard upon the motions of numerous of the defendants to dismiss. Having considered the motions, submissions of counsel and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that the action is due to be dismissed. Accordingly, in conformity with the memorandum opinion entered contemporaneously herewith, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that this action be and it hereby is DISMISSED without...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
