1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 80 Ohio
  5. 80 Ohio St.3d 152 (1997)
 

STATE EX REL. RUSSO v. DETERS

No. 97-763.

80 Ohio St.3d 152 (1997)

[THE STATE EX REL.] RUSSO, APPELLANT, v. DETERS, PROS. ATTY., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 22, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Russo, pro se.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronald W. Springman, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Russo asserts in his sole proposition of law that the court of appeals erred when it overruled his Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment.

In an appeal from a Civ.R. 60(B) determination, a reviewing court must determine whether the trial court abused its discretion. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. Adams (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 17, 20, 520 N.E.2d 564, 566. An abuse of discretion connotes conduct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases