NOBLE MANOR CO. v. PIERCE COUNTY

No. 64053-0.

943 P.2d 1378 (1997)

133 Wash.2d 269

NOBLE MANOR COMPANY, a Washington corporation, Respondent, v. PIERCE COUNTY, a municipal corporation, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided October 2, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Ladenburg, Pierce County Prosecutor and Douglas W. Vanscoy, Deputy County Prosecutor, Tacoma, for Petitioner.

Demarest & Associates, Stephen H. Demarest, Friday Harbor, for Respondent.

Meeks, Morgan & Bauer, Thomas R. Bjorgen and Christopher W. Bawn, Olympia, Amicus Curiae on behalf of Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys.

Davis, Wright, Todd, Riese & Jones, John E. Keegan, Marco De Sa E Silva and Jeffrey B. Youmans, Seattle, Amicus Curiae on behalf Building Industry Association.


GUY, Justice.

Pierce County asks this Court to construe the meaning of the statute which extended the "vested rights doctrine" to applications for short subdivisions. We conclude that upon the submission of a complete application for a short subdivision, the applicant has the right to have that application, including both the request to divide and the request to develop the land, considered under the zoning and land use laws in effect on the date of the application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases