1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 951 P.2d
  5. 951 P.2d 1365 (1997)
 

MATTER OF S.L.M.

Nos. 96-576, 96-337, 96-220, 96-546 and 96-547.

951 P.2d 1365 (1997)

In the Matter of S.L.M., a Youth. In the Matter of S.T., a Youth. In the Matter of J.L.C., a Youth. In the Matter of J.A.T., a Youth. In the Matter of L.D., a Youth.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Submitted November 14, 1997.

Decided December 30, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel P. Buckley (argued), Berg, Lilly, Andriolo & Tollefsen, Bozeman, for Appellants (96-576).

D.E. Pomery (argued), Bozeman, for Appellants (96-337).

John Keith, Great Falls, for Appellants (96-220).

Roberta A. Drew, Yellowstone County Defender's Office, Billings, for Appellants (96-546 and -547).

Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General, Cregg W. Coughlin (argued), Helena, for Respondent.

LEAPHART, Justice.

The appellants in these five appeals challenge the Extended Jurisdiction Prosecution Act, §§ 41-5-1601 through -1607, MCA, (EJPA) as being unconstitutional under the equal protection, due process and double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Montana constitutions, as well as under Article II, Section 15 of the Montana Constitution. Although there are some factual differences in how each prosecution evolved as well as differences...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases