BRONCO WINE CO. v. U.S. DEPT. OF TREASURY

No. CV-F-96-6354 REC DLB.

997 F.Supp. 1318 (1997)

BRONCO WINE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

August 1, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Malcolm S. Segal, Segal & Kirby, Sacramento, CA, Frank C. Damrell, Jr., Damrell, Nelson, Schrimp, Pallios, and Ladine, Modesto, CA, E. Vincent O'Brien, Buchman and O'Brien, for Plaintiff.

D. E. Bensing, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

COYLE, District Judge.

In December of 1996, this court issued an order denying Plaintiff Bronco Wine Company's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO"). Plaintiff had argued that Defendant Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms ("BATF" or "the Agency") should be enjoined from restricting the sale and distribution of its wine across the nation. In rejecting Plaintiff's argument...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases