1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 128 F.3d
  5. 128 F.3d 99 (1997)
 

FONAR CORP. v. MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLUS, INC.

No. 837, Docket 95-7847.

128 F.3d 99 (1997)

FONAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant, Laurence Shiff, Appellant, v. MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLUS, INC. and Robert Domenick, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided October 17, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence Shiff, Shiff & Tisman, New York City, (Stephen E. Tisman, Valerie D. Ringel, Shiff & Tisman, New York City, of counsel), for Appellant.

Ronald S. Katz, Janet Arnold Hart, Coudert Brothers, San Francisco, CA, (Lateef Mtima, Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzburg & Ellers, Philadelphia, PA, of counsel), for Appellees.

Before: WALKER, PARKER, and HEANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

I.

Laurence Shiff, attorney for plaintiff Fonar Corporation, appeals from the August 3, 1995 order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Motley, J.), which sanctioned him and Fonar pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 for their willful violation of the district court's discovery order. We affirm. The underlying action which gave rise to this appeal is the litigation between Fonar and the defendants-appellees Magnetic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases