1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 945 P.2d
  5. 945 P.2d 1304 (1997)
 

DOE v. MILES INC.

Nos. 2 CA-CV 96-0166, 2 CA-CV 96-0167.

945 P.2d 1304 (1997)

190 Ariz. 173

A. DOE, a single person, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MILES INC.; Armour Pharmaceutical Co.; Baxter Healthcare Corporation; Alpha Therapeutic Corporation; Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.; Arizona Board of Regents; University of Arizona; University of Arizona College of Medicine; State of Arizona; Dr. James Corrigan and Carolyn Corrigan; St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center; Catholic Healthcare West, Defendants/Appellees. Jane DOE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of B. Doe, deceased child of Jane Doe, for and on behalf of herself and on behalf of the Estate, and in her individual capacity, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MILES INC.; Armour Pharmaceutical Co.; Baxter Healthcare Corporation; Alpha Therapeutic Corporation; Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.; Arizona Board of Regents; University of Arizona; University of Arizona College of Medicine; State of Arizona; Dr. James Corrigan and Carolyn Corrigan; St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center; Catholic Healthcare West, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

Redesignated as Opinion and Publication Ordered April 9, 1997.

Review Granted November 14, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ibáñez & Wilkinson by Rose Marie Ibáñez, Tucson, for Plaintiffs/Appellants.

Mitten, Goodwin & Raup by Scott J. Hergenroether, Phoenix, for Defendants/Appellees St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center and Catholic Healthcare West.

Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. by Thomas A. Maraz and Todd C. Wiley, Phoenix, for Defendants/Appellees State of Arizona, Arizona Board of Regents, University of Arizona, University of Arizona College of Medicine, James Corrigan, M.D., and Carolyn Corrigan.

Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P. by Daniel J. McAuliffe and Martha E. Gibbs, Phoenix, for Defendants/Appellees Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Miles Inc., Armour Pharmaceutical Company, Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. and Alpha Therapeutic Corporation.

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

In these consolidated actions, plaintiffs/appellants Jane Doe and her son, A. Doe, contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendants/appellees on statute of limitations grounds. We disagree and therefore affirm.

We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the parties against whom summary judgment was entered and independently review any questions of law relating to the statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases