1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 211 Wis.2d
  5. 211 Wis.2d 12 (1997)
 

STATE v. RAMOS

No. 94-3036-CR.

211 Wis.2d 12 (1997)

564 N.W.2d 328

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Edward RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 20, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner there was oral argument by Paul Lundsten, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle, attorney general.

For the defendant-appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Eduardo M. Borda, Milwaukee.

¶ 1. DONALD W. STEINMETZ, J.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court's failure to remove a juror for cause constitutes reversible error when a defendant is forced to correct the trial court's error by using one of his or her statutorily provided peremptory challenges. We hold that the use of a peremptory challenge to correct a trial court error is adequate grounds for reversal because it arbitrarily deprives...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases