STATE v. KETCHUM

No. 1 CA-CR 96-629-PR.

956 P.2d 1237 (1997)

191 Ariz. 415

STATE of Arizona, Respondent, v. John Howard KETCHUM, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E.

Review Denied April 21, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terence C. Hance, Coconino County Attorney by John F. Beatty, Deputy County Attorney, Flagstaff, for Respondent.

John Howard Ketchum, Yuma, in propria persona.


OPINION

EHRLICH, Presiding Judge.

In this opinion, we address a narrow issue regarding the bifurcated trial of an offense enhanced by the allegation of a prior felony conviction: Whether evidence admitted during the "guilt phase" of the trial later may be considered by the jury to determine whether the defendant was convicted of the alleged prior felony. We hold that consideration of such evidence is proper.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases