1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 940 P.2d
  5. 940 P.2d 1219 (1997)
 

ABU-ADAS v. EMPLOYMENT DEPART.

EAB 95-AB-1473, 95-AB-1834, 95-AB-1952; CA A90650 (Control), A90651, A90652, SC S43780.

940 P.2d 1219 (1997)

325 Or. 480

Abdul ABU-ADAS, and those listed on Appendix A of the Employment Appeals Board order, Petitioners on Review, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, FOOD EMPLOYERS, INC., and Individual Employer Members of Food Employers, Inc., and Safeway, Inc., Respondents on Review. Taye ADDISU, and those listed on Attachment A of the Employment Appeals Board of order, Petitioners on Review, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, FOOD EMPLOYERS, INC., and Individual Employer Members of Food Employers, Inc., and Safeway, Inc., Respondents on Review. Suzanne B. BELL, and those listed on Appendix A of the Employment Appeals Board order, Petitioners on Review, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, FOOD EMPLOYERS, INC., and Individual Employer Members of Food Employers, Inc., and Safeway, Inc., Respondents on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided July 24, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeremy V. Sarant, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners on review.

Richard Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review Employment Department. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, GRABER, and DURHAM, JJ.

GILLETTE, Justice.

In these three unemployment compensation cases, consolidated for the purposes of administrative and judicial review, the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) denied petitioners' claims for unemployment compensation benefits.1 The EAB ruled that, because petitioners were absent from work due to a "labor dispute," they were disqualified from receiving benefits under ORS 657.200(1), set out in the margin and post at 1221...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases