VANDERMAY v. CLAYTON

92-2104; CA A91235.

935 P.2d 1221 (1997)

147 Or. App. 95

Larry J. VANDERMAY and Tamara Vandermay, husband and wife, and Flying Dutchman Enterprises, an Oregon corporation, Appellants, v. Paul D. CLAYTON, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 19, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeanyse R. Snow, Astoria, argued the cause for appellants. With her on the opening brief was McCallister & Snow.

Barbara Johnston, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Larry A. Brisbee, Hillsboro.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a directed verdict for defendant in this legal malpractice action. They assert, first, that the trial court improperly excluded the testimony of their expert witness on the ground that the expert was not qualified to give an opinion about whether defendant's actions were consistent with the applicable standard of care and, second, that several of their specifications of negligence did not require the support of expert...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases