EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, Petitioner,
v.
Ella E. BIRES, Central Point School District, Eagle Point School District and Medford School District, Respondents.
MEDFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner,
v.
EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Ella E. Bires, Respondents.
EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, Petitioner,
v.
Lorraine GOODMAN, Eugene School District # 4J, Springfield School District # 19, Junction City School District # 69, Lane County School District # 52, Pleasant Hill School District # 1, Crow-Applegate School District # 6 and Lowell School District # 71, Respondents.
SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT # 19, Petitioner,
v.
EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Lorraine Goodman, Respondents.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted February 24, 1997.
Submitted on Records and Briefs February 24, 1997.
Decided March 26, 1997.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Andrea Hungerford, Bend, argued the cause for petitioners Medford School District and Springfield School District # 19. With her on the brief was Bischof, Hungerford & Witty.
Michael C. Livingston, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Employment Department. With him on the briefs for respondent/petitioner Employment Department were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
Respondent Lorraine Goodman filed a brief pro se.
No appearance for respondents Ella E. Bires, Central Point School District, Eagle Point School District, Eugene School District # 4J, Junction City School District # 69, Lane County School District # 52, Pleasant Hill School District # 1, Crow-Applegate School District # 6 and Lowell School District # 71.
Before RIGGS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
CA A91619 and CA A91620 Argued and Submitted February 24, 1997.
CA A86537 and CA A86643 Submitted on Records and Briefs February 24, 1997.
LEESON, Judge.
Petitioners1 seek review of final orders of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) holding that claimants Ella Bires and Lorraine Goodman were not disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits during the summer recess of 1994. We address only whether EAB erred...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
