GEORGE v. UTE WATER CONSERVANCY DIST.

No. 96CA1639.

950 P.2d 1195 (1997)

Donald L. GEORGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UTE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

December 26, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wegher & Associates and Robb, Beckner, Achziger, McInnis & Palo, Arnold C. Wegher, Denver, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Williams, Turner & Holmes, P.C., William D. Prakken, Mark E. Hamilton, Grand Junction, for Defendant-Appellee.


Opinion by Judge DAVIDSON.

Plaintiff, Donald L. George, appeals from the summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of defendant, Ute Water Conservancy District, on his claims for age discrimination, breach of implied contract, promissory estoppel, and deprivation of property without due process. We affirm.

Plaintiff began working for defendant in 1966. In May 1993, he was asked to resign. When he refused, he was terminated, and was replaced by another...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases