This is a workers' compensation case. The issue presented is whether the employer is exempt from workers' compensation liability, pursuant to I.C. § 72-212(5), because it did not employ the claimant "for the sake of pecuniary gain." We conclude the employer is not exempt because it provided a service and received remuneration for it. Modlin v. Twin Falls Canal Co., 49 Idaho 199, 286 P. 612 ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.