1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 932 P.2d
  5. 932 P.2d 1190 (1997)
 

LINDQUIST v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY

LUBA No. 96-055; CA A95229.

932 P.2d 1190 (1997)

146 Or. App. 7

Stuart LINDQUIST, Petitioner, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY and Richard Noble, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 29, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Dickas, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Kell, Alterman & Runstein, L.L.P.

Michael E. Judd, Chief Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Clackamas County. With him on the brief was Clackamas County Counsel.

No appearance for respondent Richard Noble.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.

DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's memorandum opinion affirming Clackamas County's denial of his application to locate a residential dwelling not provided in conjunction with farm use (nonfarm dwelling) in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone. We affirm.

ORS 215.284(1) provides:

"(1) In the Willamette Valley, a single-family residential dwelling not provided in conjunction with farm use may be established, subject to approval of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases