Curtin, J.
This is the second Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8A appeal by the plaintiffs of the same interlocutory ruling; to wit, the denial of their motion for summary judgment. The defendants have appropriately filed a motion to dismiss this second premature appeal, and we hereby allow said motion.
There can obviously be no dispute that the denial of the plaintiffs' summary judgment motion constituted an interlocutory ruling. Panesis v. Loyal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
