1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 945 P.2d
  5. 945 P.2d 1149 (1997)
 

BLAIR v. GIM CORP., INC.

No. 14720-7-III.

945 P.2d 1149 (1997)

88 Wash.App. 475

Steven BLAIR, Appellant, v. GIM CORPORATION, INC.; Jack Lee; Homero Tamez and Maria Tamez, husband and wife; and Eddy Tamez, a/k/a Edelmiro Tamez, Jr., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel One.

October 16, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Matheson, Matheson & Matheson, Kennewick, for Appellant.

William J. Connor, Liebler, Ivey & Connor, Kennewick, for Defendants and Respondents.

BROWN, Judge.

Does a judgment debtor "controvert" a garnishment by filing a motion to quash a writ of garnishment on the basis that the garnishment proceedings are precluded by a stipulation agreement with the judgment creditor? We decide that it does and affirm the trial court's grant of attorney fees and costs pursuant to the mandatory provisions of RCW 6.27.230. We also determine the proceedings are not frivolous under RCW 4.84.185, but may be the basis for CR...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases