PER CURIAM.
Of the several issues raised by the defendant on this appeal from his sexual battery convictions, the only one which merits specific attention is the claim that the physician to whom the alleged rape was reported was improperly allowed to testify that the victim identified Banks as the perpetrator. Because the point was not properly preserved below by a specific and timely objection, Douglas v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.