SHEPARD BY SHEPARD v. PORTER

No. 48A02-9606-CV-389.

679 N.E.2d 1383 (1997)

Christopher Thomas SHEPARD, by next friend Peter A. SHEPARD and Marylou Shepard; Peter A. Shepard, and Marylou Shepard, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. Clint PORTER; Richard K. Porter; Lorna K. Porter; Estate of Andrew Neal Perkins, and Thomas E. Hamer, as Administrator of the Estate of Andrew Neal Perkins; Steven A. Perkins; Para Lee "Bonnie" Baker; Chris Kuklenski, Mark Kuklenski, Cindy Alford, Keith Givens, Steven Givens, and Cindy Givens, Appellees-Defendants. Clint PORTER, Richard K. Porter, and Lorna K. Porter, Appellants-Defendants, v. Christopher Thomas SHEPARD, by next friend Peter A. SHEPARD and Marylou Shepard, Appellees-Plaintiffs, Estate of Andrew Neal Perkins, Thomas E. Hamer, as Administrator of the Estate of Andrew Neal Perkins, Steven A. Perkins, Para Lee "Bonnie" Baker, Chris Kuklenski, Mark Kuklenski, Cindy Alford, Keith Givens, Steven Givens, and Cindy Givens, Passive Appellees-Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

Rehearing Denied August 13, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ralph E. Sipes, Busby, Austin, Cooper & Farr, Anderson, for Appellants, Christopher Thomas Shepard by next friend Peter A. Shepard and Marylou Shepard; Peter A. Shepard, and Marylou Shepard.

Rick D. Meils, Joseph M. Dietz,, Meils Thompson Dietz & Congleton Indianapolis, for Appellants, Clint Porter, Richard K. Porter, and Lorna K. Porter.

Stephen L. Bola, Alan J. Irvin, Hill, Fulwider, McDowell, Funk & Matthews, Indianapolis, for Appellees Estate of Andrew Neal Perkins, Thomas E. Hamer, as Administrator of the Estate of Andrew Neal Perkins, and Para Lee "Bonnie" Baker.

Thomas M. Carusillo, Smith & Wade, Indianapolis, for Appellees, Keith Givens, Steven Givens and Cindy Givens.

Ralph E. Sipes, Busby, Austin, Cooper & Farr, Anderson, for Appellees, Christopher Thomas Shepard, by next friend Peter A. Shepard and Marylou Shepard.


OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

In this consolidated appeal, several parties in a negligence action appeal rulings on various summary judgment motions, as well as rulings on a motion to strike certain materials submitted in opposition to summary judgment.

The facts favorable to the nonmoving party are as follows. On October 18, 1991, thirteen-year-old Christopher...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases